• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    The battery prototype demonstrated endurance, maintaining a stable structure and perfect reversibility over 6,000 cycles — equivalent to more than 16 years of daily operation — with zero loss in storage capacity.

    WTF!? If this battery is just half as good as they claim, it could be a game changer for storing power for solar and wind!

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem is that 6000 cycles in laboratory are not the same than 6000 cycles in real life scenarios.

      It would be interesting to put that battery out in the field and to see how it perform in real life conditions (assuming that they are cheap enough to be produced in large volumes)

      If they are really that good you are right, but there are always a lot of revolutionary advance in lab that never leave it.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Just make hot swapping batteries normal again like it used to be.

            In your ideal scenario would you own multiple batteries and keep them at your house, or are you looking for a subscription service where you would just buy the car (batteryless?) and then go to a rental station to have one put in, swapping batteries when they need a charge?

          • Flagstaff@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            There actually was a Chinese EV startup that had battery swap stations: drive up onto the system, and the battery is directly under your car; the swap takes <1 minute. I don’t remember what it was called, though, nor if it ever made it.

            Update: it’s Nio.

            • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Tesla did that as well about 10 years ago. They opted to not do it anymore if I recall correctly because they couldn’t control how the batteries were being maintained or what age of battery you would get.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            When was hot-swapping batteries normal? What was the backup power source? I’d only ever seen normally swappable batteries where the phone would need to power off and back on.

            • vinnymac@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’ve never owned a flip phone that I couldn’t plug in and swap the battery with a new one without it turning off. If that wasn’t normal with your phones I’m not sure why, maybe different circuitry?

              Regardless making devices easy to repair, and thus open and maintainable was what I was getting at.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Breaks from use makes perfect sense though, it allows the electrolyte to diffuse evenly. During charge /discharge cycles there’s always more or less active electrolyte being consumed/produced at the anodes and cathodes, resting means it can equalize.

          • Flagstaff@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Fascinating, I didn’t know that that’s the reason… Would you happen to have any data on how long this diffusion process takes?

            • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              I mostly just applying my undergrad chemistry classes here to make an educated guess, nothing official…

              Reactions are limited by the quantity of reagents and the mixing rate. As reagents are consumed (or produced), fresh reagent must move towards (or away) from the active anode and cathode for the reaction to continue.

              In flooded liquid electrolyte batteries (like lead acid), mixing is very high and it’s surface area that affects charge/discharge performance. In absorbed mat chemistries like most modern lithium ions, surface area is very high but electrolyte is “trapped” next to its immediate cathode/anode and cannot easily migrate throughout the matrix.

              In lead acids this sort of diffusion is extremely fast. In packed lithium ions it is definitely slower. When diffusion is too slow, the lithium ions will form dendrites (little spikes) where a gradient of ions exist because they are being deposited onto the electrode faster than the electrolyte can move ions. Thats usually what kills batteries over time and why ultra fast charge/discharge cycles are terrible for them.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If all of the claims from Chinese tech companies and research was half as good as they claim we would all learn Mandarin by now.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is exactly right, and simplified Chinese is actually extremely popular to learn here now. (Denmark)
        And no wonder, they have become leaders of several key (future) technologies.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Counter point: I know exactly one person who learned Mandarin and several dozen who don‘t. Pretty much everyone learned english and (to a lesser degree) a third language that isn‘t Mandarin either. French, Spanish and Japanese are popular, though.